GH-RandomDrawing

一開始有個六角柱體，接著隨機的從側邊的六個面選一個面鏡射過去。
當然也可以只選擇其中兩個面來操作，每次產生的圖形都會也很大的不同。
上面的圖形大概是跑了將近4000的六角形柱，時間大概是15分鐘，
如果有時間的話可以試試更大的參數，但越到後面電腦越崩潰就是了。

可以看到有些地方因為重疊的關係顏色是比較深的，
而且常會有在原地打轉的問題，現在還想不到不會重複的方法。

記得以前大一給陳宣誠老師曾經對我說的一句話，
"你必須把自己丟遠點再去追"
數位好玩的地方有時也是因為電腦會帶你到你不曾想過的地方去，
有種你的腦還沒到，但你的手已經跑到很前面去了的感覺。



Generate  a hexagonal column at first, then random chooses one of  the side surface to  mirror it.
Of course you can choose two of  the side surfaces to manipulate, and you will get a variety of graphics each time.
The top graphic is running almost 4000 hexagonal columns about 15 minutes.
if you get time you can try more larger parameter, but it should be careful when the numbers of parameters beyond your computer ability.

Because of overlapping matter, graphic has deeper color at some areas,
and sometimes it will rotate in the same places more than one times, but I still don't know how to solve it.

My teacher(Eric Chen) has told me that you have to throw yourself into far away place. and trace it at the place you've never imagined before.I think that is why computer is fun.


-shaun--

GH-Burning Image

先在圖形上撒規則的點，使圖形能變成數據化，
每個點再以數據化後的數值分別向 x, y軸進行移動，
最後將搖擺的線與原本的直線Loft就完成了。

最簡單的應用是直接將數值當成半徑畫成圓，
在路上十分常見，也滿吸引人的。

Spreading regular points on the image at first, and the purpose is transforming image into data.
Next step is moving points toward x,y axis, and then image turns into data in each points.
At last, loft the original lines and the swing's lines.

The most easy application is regarded the data as radius of circle.
It's very common on the street, and I felt attracted as well.


--Shaun--

Portfolio

"DaiShuan Portfolio"

最近大概就是在忙著準備找工作用的作品集。

念了5年的建築其實回過頭來看還滿慶幸的，
畢竟有一些實體的東西可以檢視自己是否持續在往前。

做設計的時候一直有個壞習慣就是"收"不起來，
往往加了太多東西而失去原本的純粹性。
這在大五最後評圖的時候確實帶給我很大的困擾，
或許當中有想掩蓋某些不成熟的因素吧。

在作品集的當中，
可以發現我完全沒有放平面設計的圖，
因為我根本沒有那樣的圖可以放阿!
不知不覺地走向裝置和亭子的方向去了，
但這並不太表我我排斥傳統建築那塊領域，
只是能實驗新的方法和想法還是比較吸引著我。

Recently, i'm busy for portfolio, which the purpose is looking for the job.

Studied architecture for five years, i feel so lucky when i look back what i've done.
After all, i can inspect myself whether i'm keep moving forwards or not with some solid things.

I had a bad habit, when i designed something i couldn't figure out which steps i should stop,
added too much complicated elements into design, so lost pure goals at same time.
It brought me a huge trouble at final review,
perhaps, i wanted to cover some immature aspects.

i didn't put any plan's design into my portfolio,
because actually i didn't own that in the past three years!
unconsciously, i've walked toward installation and pavilion for a while.
But it doesn't mean i exclude traditional architecture field.
It's just because it deeply attract me if i can experiment new ways and thoughts.

--Shaun--